posted by
piglet at 01:58pm on 24/09/2010
- listen
- listen
- listen
- think
- flap your gums
I'm flailing between steps 3 & 4. Want to thank everyone for their comments & input. Here's a roundup of who I've heard:
http://ashnistrike.livejournal.com/
http://asim.livejournal.com/
http://bcholmes.livejournal.com/
http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/
http://epi-lj.livejournal.com/
http://hermetic.livejournal.com/
http://hotcoffeems.livejournal.com/
http://jenwrites.livejournal.com/
http://jonquil.dreamwidth.org/
http://karnythia.livejournal.com/
http://kynn.livejournal.com/
http://maevele.dreamwidth.org/
http://www.mamohanraj.com/
http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/
http://nisi-la.livejournal.com/
http://nojojojo.livejournal.com/
http://sajia.livejournal.com/
http://saladinahmed.livejournal.co
http://www.sandrewswann.com/
http://seeking-avalon.blogspot.com/
http://tempest.fluidartist.com/
http://tithenai.livejournal.com/
http://trinker.livejournal.com/
http://upyernoz.blogspot.com/
http://yeloson.dreamwidth.org/
http://yonmei.insanejournal.com/
http://weekdayblues.wordpress.com/
And, of course, here:
http://wisconnews.blogspot.com/201
http://wiscon.livejournal.com/
http://wiscon.dreamwidth.org/
As well as everyone who e-mailed concom35@wiscon.info directly.
I read (am re-reading) the comment threads with care & attention, as well. Are there other voices I have not heard? Please post links below, if you are so moved. I also invite you to comment here, or e-mail either concom35@wiscon.info (to reach the co-chairs, Karen, Joanna & me) or me directly to express your opinion privately (your opinion but not your identity will be shared with my co-chairs & the concom as a whole).
I would also like to apologize for my failure of imagination. I thought I was asking for a con in which we could have these conversations:
1. an apology from Ms. Moon
2. education of each other by those who are willing
3. celebrations of & explorations of the specific groups targeted by her post in our SF/F context
*and* our special topics for this year:
4. Tiptree 20th anniversary celebrations
5. Nisi Shawl, woo!!
*and* our usual tracks.
I am coming to understand that the burden of heavy lifting in the 2nd conversation, above, falls disproportionately on those targeted by her words, and that it may not be possible for that conversation not to overshadow the rest of them, sucking us all into a death-spiral of racism-101 fail. I'm sorry I didn't see that before. (I might still have suggested this course, but possibly less ham-handedly? Hypotheticals not my strong suit.) Huge thanks for the e-mail cluebat on that score!
(no subject)
http://sanguinity.dreamwidth.org/21
http://yasaman.dreamwidth.org/355490.ht
http://glass-icarus.dreamwidth.org/2508
http://littlebutfierce.dreamwidth.org/3
Here via laceblade
http://deepad.dreamwidth.org/57932.h
http://delux-vivens.livejournal.com/198
http://elf.dreamwidth.org/351355.ht
The Dreamwidth content search is pretty good -- you can find a lot of posts by searching on "elizabeth moon" or "wiscon".
Re: Here via laceblade
(no subject)
http://springheel-jack.livejournal.c
(no subject)
(no subject)
I suggested this as a possibility in my linked post ("drama of reconciliation") but I thought that was hyperbole on my part.
(no subject)
If the situation is currently "she isn't apologetic, but we retained her as GoH in the hope that she'll have changed her mind by con time" -- not the same thing.
Obviously it would be very nice if she does in fact change her mind and apologize (and eternal kudos to Nisi Shawl for being willing to engage with her on this). But IMHO that doesn't really alter the issues with the concom's decision.
(no subject)
Maybe that's a failure of imagination on my part. But I can't see how that is in any way an appropriate goal to have for the hosts of a Guest of Honor. I can't see how turning part of the con into Watch Moon Apologize and Respond to Moon's Apology and maybe Group Hug and so on helps the convention. It could be just that I find that sort of thing squirmingly inadequate, but I don't think it's just me. The NYTimes had an article today ("The Public Apology Is Nothing but a Sorry Act") about how public apologies suck. They were talking sports, not sf conventions, but I think the point holds.
If Moon apologizes before the con? Maaaaaaaaaybe; it depends on many things, including timing, and wording, and so on; such a statement is already well past its "best before" date and I'm not sure I could consider anything she says seriously. But seriously for the love of baby otters, how does Moon's apology work as a valid and appropriate goal for the con? I don't get it at all.
If I go to the con, it will not be because I have any interest in the latest after-school special on the education of one of the guests of honor.
(no subject)
I still think there's a big gap, and there's more work for the committee to do, but this is much better than the situation on Wednesday.
(no subject)
(no subject)
http://firecat.dreamwidth.org/689826.ht
Going back to #1-4.
{hugs and support}
(no subject)
Jim Hines also had some discussion in his lj. http//jimhines.livejournal.com
More linkage
http://www.facebook.com/notes/s-and
I'm very conflicted about what I'd do if I ruled the world, though I lean towards disinvitation as a solution, given not the post but the post-post (as it were) re-action by Ms. Moon.
I have sympathy for the extent of the problem. As a con-goer, I'll support the concom's decision. As a con-goer, I appreciate the effort you're putting in to steps 1-5. Best of luck.
(no subject)
(no subject)
i didn't see this listed
(no subject)
i.e., worry less about Elizabeth Moon and more about Muslim community members.
(no subject)
This exactly.
(no subject)
(no subject)
a recent article.